02-07-2009, 06:51 PM
<!--quoteo(post=16658:date=Feb 7 2009, 04:42 PM:name=Clapp)-->QUOTE (Clapp @ Feb 7 2009, 04:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=16657:date=Feb 7 2009, 03:41 PM:name=bz)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bz @ Feb 7 2009, 03:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I don't like that philosophy. If you score runs early you don't have to worry about those late inning runs as often. Get to em early, get their starter out, then attack the bullpen early.
Ideally, you'd like players that are both clutch and can score runs at any point in the game. However, that ain't gonna happen.
The best chance for success in the playoffs is to score runs early and get to their bullpen, just like the regular season. If you are concerned about getting those late inning runs, then you team has a problem.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
We're not scoring at all in the playoffs, that's the problem.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That is because they sucked in the playoffs. Yes, we weren't "clutch" but adding clutch players isn't going to guarantee anything. Designing the team to be more clutch isn't going to do anything. We can't change the whole roster and there's limited amount of players to be added that are either "clutch", (I guess) early run scorers, or both.
The playoffs tend to be a crapshoot, but usually the better teams win. You have to play the odds and averages and just score runs. While I believe that intangibles do effect a teams performance, you can't build a team based on the unknown. That's just...dumb. You have to build a team that, simply, scores runs. The earlier in the game, the better.
Ideally, you'd like players that are both clutch and can score runs at any point in the game. However, that ain't gonna happen.
The best chance for success in the playoffs is to score runs early and get to their bullpen, just like the regular season. If you are concerned about getting those late inning runs, then you team has a problem.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
We're not scoring at all in the playoffs, that's the problem.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That is because they sucked in the playoffs. Yes, we weren't "clutch" but adding clutch players isn't going to guarantee anything. Designing the team to be more clutch isn't going to do anything. We can't change the whole roster and there's limited amount of players to be added that are either "clutch", (I guess) early run scorers, or both.
The playoffs tend to be a crapshoot, but usually the better teams win. You have to play the odds and averages and just score runs. While I believe that intangibles do effect a teams performance, you can't build a team based on the unknown. That's just...dumb. You have to build a team that, simply, scores runs. The earlier in the game, the better.
If Angelo had picked McClellin, I would have been expecting to hear by training camp that kid has stage 4 cancer, is actually 5'2" 142 lbs, is a chick who played in a 7 - 0 defensive scheme who only rotated in on downs which were 3 and 34 yds + so is not expecting to play a down in the NFL until the sex change is complete and she puts on another 100 lbs. + but this is Emery's first pick so he'll get a pass with a bit of questioning. - 1060Ivy