02-06-2009, 03:20 PM
<!--quoteo(post=16459:date=Feb 6 2009, 12:17 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Feb 6 2009, 12:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=16453:date=Feb 6 2009, 12:50 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ Feb 6 2009, 12:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=16450:date=Feb 6 2009, 11:38 AM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ Feb 6 2009, 11:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->everyone is finding it ironic that they're making a movie about a guy who's never won a thing. you brought up hendry, which was irrelevant to the conversation, and i pointed out the fact that no one is making a movie about him. hope that clarifies things a little.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Exactly. Beane's a good GM, so is Hendry. Should there be a movie about either of them? Absolutely not.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm not saying a movie based on Moneyball should be made -- it shouldn't. But Beane, for better or for worse, has revolutionized the way people look at, analyze, <b>hell -- even play the game.</b> Hendry hasn't done anything like that at all. If you had to make a movie about one of them, you make it about Beane.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No it hasn't.
Exactly. Beane's a good GM, so is Hendry. Should there be a movie about either of them? Absolutely not.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm not saying a movie based on Moneyball should be made -- it shouldn't. But Beane, for better or for worse, has revolutionized the way people look at, analyze, <b>hell -- even play the game.</b> Hendry hasn't done anything like that at all. If you had to make a movie about one of them, you make it about Beane.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No it hasn't.
@TheBlogfines