01-31-2009, 08:37 PM
<!--quoteo(post=15083:date=Jan 31 2009, 07:28 PM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ Jan 31 2009, 07:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=15058:date=Jan 31 2009, 05:00 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Jan 31 2009, 05:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=15057:date=Jan 31 2009, 05:54 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Jan 31 2009, 05:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->For me, unless we somehow end up with Peavy, Marshall has earned his spot in the starting rotation. He's done everything he's been asked to do and has done it successfully, with ERAs under 4 the last 2 seasons. The whole "let them battle it out in Spring Training" idea is generally pretty retarded if you ask me. I think we know what we have in Marshall by now, and a limited # of innings in Spring Training shouldn't really change anything.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I agree, unless Marshall's stuff looks like shit in ST, and someone else is missing every bat.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm thinking the Heilman deal was made to enable Marshall to be the 5th with Heilman going into Marshall's swigman role.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I don't know that it had quite that level of purpose - I assume it was just more depth, and a guy that Hendry hearts. I hope it plays out that way, though.
I agree, unless Marshall's stuff looks like shit in ST, and someone else is missing every bat.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm thinking the Heilman deal was made to enable Marshall to be the 5th with Heilman going into Marshall's swigman role.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I don't know that it had quite that level of purpose - I assume it was just more depth, and a guy that Hendry hearts. I hope it plays out that way, though.
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.