01-28-2009, 07:42 PM
<!--quoteo(post=14428:date=Jan 28 2009, 05:01 PM:name=KBwsb)-->QUOTE (KBwsb @ Jan 28 2009, 05:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=14426:date=Jan 28 2009, 04:57 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Jan 28 2009, 04:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Ok, so when viewed in isolation, the deal we're pissed about is the DeRosa deal.
I agree with that. <b>I think trading DeRosa was the right move regardless</b>, but the return was not enough.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
why?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
because hendry and lou want a more balanced lineup. why is this so hard to grasp? derosa was the only righthanded hitter that had value/no no-trade clause/no burdensome contract. THATS why he was traded. basically they exchanged derosa for bradley.
I agree with that. <b>I think trading DeRosa was the right move regardless</b>, but the return was not enough.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
why?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
because hendry and lou want a more balanced lineup. why is this so hard to grasp? derosa was the only righthanded hitter that had value/no no-trade clause/no burdensome contract. THATS why he was traded. basically they exchanged derosa for bradley.
Wang.