01-28-2009, 06:50 PM
<!--quoteo(post=14418:date=Jan 28 2009, 04:39 PM:name=Sandberg)-->QUOTE (Sandberg @ Jan 28 2009, 04:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I agree with the point that this trade in isolation is fine, but I also think that a lot of people were saving their anger because it appeared as if the Peavy thing was going to happen. It still might, but "appears" less likely now. I, for one, would have been pissed about the DeRosa trade if I didn't think we were going to get Peavy.
Also nobody give me the Bradley bullshit when it comes to DeRosa. We could have had both as our salary limit still stands.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
What is our salary limit?
Also nobody give me the Bradley bullshit when it comes to DeRosa. We could have had both as our salary limit still stands.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
What is our salary limit?
"Drink Up and Beat Off!"
-KBWSB
"Will I be looked on poorly if my religion involved punting little people?"
-Jody
-KBWSB
"Will I be looked on poorly if my religion involved punting little people?"
-Jody