01-28-2009, 02:27 PM
<!--quoteo(post=14233:date=Jan 28 2009, 12:21 PM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ Jan 28 2009, 12:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=14228:date=Jan 28 2009, 12:12 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Jan 28 2009, 12:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->If we look at this trade in isolation - assuming it really is Cedeno and Olson for Heilman - doesn't it, again, in isolation, make the Cubs better? I'm not trying to be an apologist for the deal; I'm just pleased to be getting Heilman.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I don't think it does anything positive for the Cubs. It fills a swingman position which is already filled by Marshall and Gaudin and creates another hole in the bench, all the while losing 2 tradeable pieces for no reason.
It's becoming more and more evident, that there is no grand plan this offseason for Hendry. Peavy ain't coming and we've done a bunch of shuffling around of the roster while basically standing in place.
I would have rather we went into 2009 with the exact same roster we ended 2008 with than do what has been done so far this offseason.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I concur
I don't think it does anything positive for the Cubs. It fills a swingman position which is already filled by Marshall and Gaudin and creates another hole in the bench, all the while losing 2 tradeable pieces for no reason.
It's becoming more and more evident, that there is no grand plan this offseason for Hendry. Peavy ain't coming and we've done a bunch of shuffling around of the roster while basically standing in place.
I would have rather we went into 2009 with the exact same roster we ended 2008 with than do what has been done so far this offseason.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I concur