12-06-2017, 02:27 PM
There never was any objection to the proposal that if a keeper is kept using a higher than required pick (e.g., using a 6th round pick if a 7th round pick is unavailable), the keeper status the following year would revert to where it "should have been." Using that example, the player could be kept in the 6th round in consecutive years - the first year using a 6 because no 7 was available, the next year using a 6 because a 7 "should have" been used the prior year.
If there are any objections, speak up. Otherwise, this will be implemented next season.
If there are any objections, speak up. Otherwise, this will be implemented next season.
This is not some silly theory that's unsupported and deserves being mocked by photos of Xena.
![[Image: ITgoyeg.png]](http://i.imgur.com/ITgoyeg.png)