01-12-2009, 08:06 PM
<!--quoteo(post=11053:date=Jan 12 2009, 05:04 PM:name=cigar)-->QUOTE (cigar @ Jan 12 2009, 05:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=11043:date=Jan 12 2009, 05:36 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Jan 12 2009, 05:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=11035:date=Jan 12 2009, 05:05 PM:name=cigar)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cigar @ Jan 12 2009, 05:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Anybody that thinks Andre Dawson does not belong in the HOF does not know shit about baseball. It is simple as that.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I don't really think it's that cut and dry. I think he deserves to be in, but I don't see it as a slam dunk. If Jim Rice is there though, Dawson should be too.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think it is but to each his own. Dawson should be compared to his era not the sblown up statistics era of todays game. If that was done like it should of been Dawson is a slam dunk.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yep, and Len just said that on Tribune Live.
I don't really think it's that cut and dry. I think he deserves to be in, but I don't see it as a slam dunk. If Jim Rice is there though, Dawson should be too.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think it is but to each his own. Dawson should be compared to his era not the sblown up statistics era of todays game. If that was done like it should of been Dawson is a slam dunk.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yep, and Len just said that on Tribune Live.
@TheBlogfines