Sons of Ivy › Chicago Cubs › The Friendly Confines v
Why not have Bradley lead off?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
Why not have Bradley lead off?
HTC Offline
Senior Member
****
Posts: 647
Threads: 38
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 0
#29
01-07-2009, 12:11 AM
I don't want Lee hitting second and I don't want him hitting third. If Soriano's healthy enough to steal bases like he started doing toward the end of 08, I could probably handle Lee hitting second, but if not, you're just asking for double plays in front of the heart of the order. Lee needs to be hitting about fifth or sixth at this point.
Website Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by veryzer - 01-06-2009, 11:55 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 12:00 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Jody - 01-06-2009, 12:11 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by rok - 01-06-2009, 12:20 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Cubbie1983 - 01-06-2009, 12:44 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by rok - 01-06-2009, 12:47 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 12:54 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 12:54 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 01:00 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 01:06 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by bz - 01-06-2009, 01:13 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 01:16 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by bz - 01-06-2009, 01:18 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 02:10 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 02:15 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 02:22 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 02:24 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 02:29 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 02:38 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by veryzer - 01-06-2009, 02:46 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 02:57 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by veryzer - 01-06-2009, 03:00 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 03:15 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Jody - 01-06-2009, 03:17 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 03:27 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Mikey - 01-06-2009, 11:18 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Clapp - 01-06-2009, 11:37 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by twitterwoods - 01-07-2009, 12:03 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by HTC - 01-07-2009, 12:11 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Clapp - 01-07-2009, 01:31 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-07-2009, 03:57 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by bz - 01-07-2009, 05:59 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by ruby23 - 01-07-2009, 10:04 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-07-2009, 04:13 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Fly - 01-08-2009, 02:17 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by dk123 - 01-08-2009, 02:58 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)