Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why not have Bradley lead off?
#22
<!--quoteo(post=9409:date=Jan 6 2009, 12:57 PM:name=KBwsb)-->QUOTE (KBwsb @ Jan 6 2009, 12:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=9400:date=Jan 6 2009, 12:46 PM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ Jan 6 2009, 12:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=9394:date=Jan 6 2009, 12:38 PM:name=KBwsb)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (KBwsb @ Jan 6 2009, 12:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=9387:date=Jan 6 2009, 12:29 PM:name=sleepyhead)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (sleepyhead @ Jan 6 2009, 12:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=9386:date=Jan 6 2009, 12:24 PM:name=KBwsb)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (KBwsb @ Jan 6 2009, 12:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->OK, I'm going to change my signature.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I'm sorry are you saying Dunn isn't a defensive liability? Are you saying Ozzie Smith was?

this isn't entirely anecdotal. I may not watch every Reds games, but I've seen enough and heard analysis from enough experts to know that I'm not wrong.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Sleepy, <b>I never said Dunn wasn't a defensive liability.
He is. You can quote me on it.</b>

<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
does dunn <i>know</i> you're his father? maybe you could get us some good seats or something.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Does that sound like the sort of thing a kindly daddy would say about his offspring?

(He's a good boy.)
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

it depends on whether he knows or not.
Wang.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by veryzer - 01-06-2009, 11:55 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 12:00 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Jody - 01-06-2009, 12:11 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by rok - 01-06-2009, 12:20 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Cubbie1983 - 01-06-2009, 12:44 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by rok - 01-06-2009, 12:47 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 12:54 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 12:54 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 01:00 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 01:06 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by bz - 01-06-2009, 01:13 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 01:16 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by bz - 01-06-2009, 01:18 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 02:10 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 02:15 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 02:22 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 02:24 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 02:29 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 02:38 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by veryzer - 01-06-2009, 02:46 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 02:57 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by veryzer - 01-06-2009, 03:00 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 03:15 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Jody - 01-06-2009, 03:17 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 03:27 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Mikey - 01-06-2009, 11:18 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Clapp - 01-06-2009, 11:37 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by twitterwoods - 01-07-2009, 12:03 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by HTC - 01-07-2009, 12:11 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Clapp - 01-07-2009, 01:31 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-07-2009, 03:57 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by bz - 01-07-2009, 05:59 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by ruby23 - 01-07-2009, 10:04 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-07-2009, 04:13 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Fly - 01-08-2009, 02:17 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by dk123 - 01-08-2009, 02:58 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)