01-06-2009, 01:15 PM
<!--quoteo(post=9357:date=Jan 6 2009, 11:14 AM:name=KBwsb)-->QUOTE (KBwsb @ Jan 6 2009, 11:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=9353:date=Jan 6 2009, 11:08 AM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jan 6 2009, 11:08 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=9350:date=Jan 6 2009, 11:04 AM:name=KBwsb)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (KBwsb @ Jan 6 2009, 11:04 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I think Tom and Butch should re-read that last paragraph, and let it fester.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I've read it twice and I don't understand it. Why are they treated as equals when the Cubs should clearly have more leverage? Who is treating them as equals, and why? Who is enforcing it? It makes no business sense at all.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Because Reinsdorf is a master negotiator and the Trib guys are complete pussies?
To me, that seems obvious.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well, that should change under new ownership whether it ends up being Cuban or not.
I've read it twice and I don't understand it. Why are they treated as equals when the Cubs should clearly have more leverage? Who is treating them as equals, and why? Who is enforcing it? It makes no business sense at all.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Because Reinsdorf is a master negotiator and the Trib guys are complete pussies?
To me, that seems obvious.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well, that should change under new ownership whether it ends up being Cuban or not.