Sons of Ivy › Chicago Cubs › The Friendly Confines v
Why not have Bradley lead off?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
Why not have Bradley lead off?
sleepyhead Offline
Senior Member
****
Posts: 676
Threads: 23
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 0
#7
01-06-2009, 12:54 PM
<!--quoteo(post=9342:date=Jan 6 2009, 10:44 AM:name=Cubbie1983)-->QUOTE (Cubbie1983 @ Jan 6 2009, 10:44 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Why not sign Dunn and put him in LF, then put Soriano back at 2nd.........I can dream about this lineup can't I?

Soriano
Lee
Bradley
Ramirez
Dunn
Soto
Theriot
Fuk / Pie
P<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Dunn in LF and Sori at 2B hurts our defense way more than it helps our offense.
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by veryzer - 01-06-2009, 11:55 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 12:00 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Jody - 01-06-2009, 12:11 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by rok - 01-06-2009, 12:20 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Cubbie1983 - 01-06-2009, 12:44 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by rok - 01-06-2009, 12:47 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 12:54 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 12:54 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 01:00 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 01:06 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by bz - 01-06-2009, 01:13 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 01:16 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by bz - 01-06-2009, 01:18 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 02:10 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 02:15 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 02:22 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 02:24 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 02:29 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 02:38 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by veryzer - 01-06-2009, 02:46 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 02:57 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by veryzer - 01-06-2009, 03:00 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 03:15 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Jody - 01-06-2009, 03:17 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 03:27 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Mikey - 01-06-2009, 11:18 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Clapp - 01-06-2009, 11:37 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by twitterwoods - 01-07-2009, 12:03 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by HTC - 01-07-2009, 12:11 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Clapp - 01-07-2009, 01:31 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-07-2009, 03:57 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by bz - 01-07-2009, 05:59 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by ruby23 - 01-07-2009, 10:04 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-07-2009, 04:13 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Fly - 01-08-2009, 02:17 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by dk123 - 01-08-2009, 02:58 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)