Sons of Ivy › Chicago Cubs › The Friendly Confines v
Why not have Bradley lead off?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
Why not have Bradley lead off?
veryzer Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 78
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 0
#1
01-06-2009, 11:55 AM
a .436 obp and a little pop at the top seems to be what the cubs need. why not lead off bradley and drop soriano to clean up?

1. bradley
2. theriot
3. lee
4. soriano
5. ramirez
6. soto
7. fontenot
8. fuk/johnson
9. zambrano

the reason i bat soriano clean up is because he's strctly a fastball hitter and he needs protection. i don't think soto provides the kind of protection ramirez brings.
Wang.
Website Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by veryzer - 01-06-2009, 11:55 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 12:00 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Jody - 01-06-2009, 12:11 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by rok - 01-06-2009, 12:20 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Cubbie1983 - 01-06-2009, 12:44 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by rok - 01-06-2009, 12:47 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 12:54 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 12:54 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 01:00 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 01:06 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by bz - 01-06-2009, 01:13 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 01:16 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by bz - 01-06-2009, 01:18 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 02:10 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 02:15 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 02:22 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 02:24 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by sleepyhead - 01-06-2009, 02:29 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 02:38 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by veryzer - 01-06-2009, 02:46 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 02:57 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by veryzer - 01-06-2009, 03:00 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 03:15 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Jody - 01-06-2009, 03:17 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-06-2009, 03:27 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Mikey - 01-06-2009, 11:18 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Clapp - 01-06-2009, 11:37 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by twitterwoods - 01-07-2009, 12:03 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by HTC - 01-07-2009, 12:11 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Clapp - 01-07-2009, 01:31 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-07-2009, 03:57 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by bz - 01-07-2009, 05:59 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by ruby23 - 01-07-2009, 10:04 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by kbwsb - 01-07-2009, 04:13 PM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by Fly - 01-08-2009, 02:17 AM
Why not have Bradley lead off? - by dk123 - 01-08-2009, 02:58 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)