01-05-2009, 09:57 PM
<!--quoteo(post=9231:date=Jan 5 2009, 07:32 PM:name=KBwsb)-->QUOTE (KBwsb @ Jan 5 2009, 07:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=9230:date=Jan 5 2009, 07:25 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jan 5 2009, 07:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->A guy like DeRosa who can hit and play nearly anywhere on the field sure will be useful as insurance if we sign a guy like Bradley.
Oh. Oops.
Don't fucking sign Miles, keep DeRosa, and we're SO much better off. I simply can't get my head wrapped around this thing.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Me neither. Now that we've signed Bradley to play 99 or 100 games a year for us, the DeRosa trade actually makes LESS sense than on the day it happened, if that's possible.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Agreed... that's why we have to be getting Peavy.
Oh. Oops.
Don't fucking sign Miles, keep DeRosa, and we're SO much better off. I simply can't get my head wrapped around this thing.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Me neither. Now that we've signed Bradley to play 99 or 100 games a year for us, the DeRosa trade actually makes LESS sense than on the day it happened, if that's possible.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Agreed... that's why we have to be getting Peavy.
@TheBlogfines