05-30-2014, 01:53 PM
Quote:
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Clapp" data-cid="220685" data-time="1401472013">
<div>
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="VanSlawAndCottoCheese" data-cid="220683" data-time="1401471839">
<div>
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="funkster" data-cid="220678" data-time="1401471303">
<div>
Yeah, I don't know if that's a legit reason to keep people down in their rankings. Miguel Sano strikes out every bit as much as those two do, yet you still saw him in the top 3 of every ranking for the last three years. I don't think anyone would argue that B&B don't have almost as much, if not as much, power potential as Sano.
Fair point, although Sano is younger than either Baez or Bryant--and has a far better walk rate than the former. Really, though, we're talking about the difference of a few slots.
</div>
</blockquote>
Sano is also going to be recovering from Tommy John for a while and is unlikely to be the defender either Baez or Bryant are. And especially in Baez's case the value is higher while Baez is a middle infielder. I think most executives would take Baez and Bryant over Sano at the moment.
</div>
</blockquote>
I agree. I was just coming up with possible justifications for his past high rankings.
</div>
</blockquote>
Gotcha
@TheBlogfines