09-02-2016, 01:25 PM
I still don't see this as a loophole but as a different keeper issue altogether. As I mentioned before, PcB's move comes at no one else's expense. I also don't see it as douchebaggery. I might have done the same thing PcB did had I been thinking of it--and I certainly would not see it as underhanded. I really don't understand why this would bother people. Particularly--and again I had forgotten this--since Gordon is suspended for the first four games.
But like I said earlier, I'd vote for a keeper deadline to keep this from being an issue in the future. So if there are two votes to be counted, mine are
1: PcB gets to keep Gordon
2: Starting this year, we establish a keeper deadline
But like I said earlier, I'd vote for a keeper deadline to keep this from being an issue in the future. So if there are two votes to be counted, mine are
1: PcB gets to keep Gordon
2: Starting this year, we establish a keeper deadline
One dick can poke an eye out. A hundred dicks can move mountains.
--Veryzer
--Veryzer