04-14-2011, 03:13 PM
<!--quoteo(post=139974:date=Apr 14 2011, 02:12 PM:name=Runnys)-->QUOTE (Runnys @ Apr 14 2011, 02:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=139851:date=Apr 14 2011, 01:59 AM:name=bz)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bz @ Apr 14 2011, 01:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Yea, but in a game where 27 outs is your time allotment, 95% isn't that great...if in fact that were true.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
For the base umps it isn't that great. But for home plate umps seeing 225+ pitches a game, i would say getting 95% of those calls correct is pretty good.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
We have the technology to get 100% of the calls everywhere on the field correct 100% of the time. Why don't we use it?
For the base umps it isn't that great. But for home plate umps seeing 225+ pitches a game, i would say getting 95% of those calls correct is pretty good.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
We have the technology to get 100% of the calls everywhere on the field correct 100% of the time. Why don't we use it?