03-03-2011, 03:34 PM
<!--quoteo(post=132416:date=Mar 3 2011, 06:11 AM:name=Giff)-->QUOTE (Giff @ Mar 3 2011, 06:11 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=132379:date=Mar 2 2011, 07:36 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Mar 2 2011, 07:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=132374:date=Mar 2 2011, 06:27 PM:name=Dirk)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dirk @ Mar 2 2011, 06:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=132372:date=Mar 2 2011, 06:16 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Mar 2 2011, 06:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=132307:date=Mar 2 2011, 03:21 PM:name=rok)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rok @ Mar 2 2011, 03:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=132298:date=Mar 2 2011, 01:36 PM:name=Giff)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Giff @ Mar 2 2011, 01:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Kevin Goldstein's Organizational Rankings at BP
<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <!--quotec-->23. Chicago Cubs
Garza plunders depth
Wasn't so good to start with
Sign more football stars!<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well, that's just ridiculous.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Completely indefensible and lazy.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not so much lazy
haikus are so hard to write
I couldn't do it
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
What I am saying
Is the ranking and reason
Suggest no effort
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
He already did 3,000 word essays on every single team with scouting reports on every top 11 prospect of each team.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Sigh - I know. I'm saying that the ranking (23rd after being near the top 10) and the rationale for the huge drop (loss of a few of the better prospects) are lazy. Any idiot can say "gee willackers, the Cubs traded for Matt Garza, so they must suck now." In absolutely no universe is the Cubs' farm system, in total, the 8th worst in baseball. It's utterly ludicrous, particularly after the Gorzelanny trade (specifically Burgess), signing Szczur and signing the two new Cuban players. Those replace, or come close to replacing, the guys lost in the Garza deal.
Sorry I couldn't do it in a haiku.
<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <!--quotec-->23. Chicago Cubs
Garza plunders depth
Wasn't so good to start with
Sign more football stars!<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well, that's just ridiculous.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Completely indefensible and lazy.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not so much lazy
haikus are so hard to write
I couldn't do it
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
What I am saying
Is the ranking and reason
Suggest no effort
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
He already did 3,000 word essays on every single team with scouting reports on every top 11 prospect of each team.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Sigh - I know. I'm saying that the ranking (23rd after being near the top 10) and the rationale for the huge drop (loss of a few of the better prospects) are lazy. Any idiot can say "gee willackers, the Cubs traded for Matt Garza, so they must suck now." In absolutely no universe is the Cubs' farm system, in total, the 8th worst in baseball. It's utterly ludicrous, particularly after the Gorzelanny trade (specifically Burgess), signing Szczur and signing the two new Cuban players. Those replace, or come close to replacing, the guys lost in the Garza deal.
Sorry I couldn't do it in a haiku.
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.