01-18-2011, 03:56 PM
<!--quoteo(post=127032:date=Jan 18 2011, 01:25 PM:name=Kid)-->QUOTE (Kid @ Jan 18 2011, 01:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=127027:date=Jan 18 2011, 02:16 PM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ Jan 18 2011, 02:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=127021:date=Jan 18 2011, 12:52 PM:name=Kid)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid @ Jan 18 2011, 12:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=127020:date=Jan 18 2011, 01:50 PM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ Jan 18 2011, 01:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I watched it last night and I thought it was well acted, interesting, and kind of boring. I liked it, but I didn't love it.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Literally, this post applies to me 100%, including watching it last night.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Are you saying you're well acted, interesting and boring or the movie is?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Could be both. Actually, can something be both interesting and boring? Isn't that oxymoronic?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm oxymoronic.
Maybe interesting but slow is a better way to put it.
Literally, this post applies to me 100%, including watching it last night.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Are you saying you're well acted, interesting and boring or the movie is?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Could be both. Actually, can something be both interesting and boring? Isn't that oxymoronic?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm oxymoronic.
Maybe interesting but slow is a better way to put it.
Wang.