12-07-2010, 11:45 AM
<!--quoteo(post=122098:date=Dec 7 2010, 09:42 AM:name=veryzer)-->QUOTE (veryzer @ Dec 7 2010, 09:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=122096:date=Dec 7 2010, 09:40 AM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Dec 7 2010, 09:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Natalie Portman definitely deserves Oscar consideration. I still think the lead from Winter's Bone should probably take home the Best Actress Oscar, but Portman should get a nomination. She clearly poured everything she had into the role. I like the movie a lot, but it didn't have quite the same visceral impact that Requiem had. That's not necessarily a criticism because very few movies have the same visceral impact of Requiem...
It was actually very similar in a lot of ways to The Wrestler, thematically. But Natalie Portman is a lot more fun to look at for 2 hours than Mickey Rourke.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
My taint is more fun to look at that Micky Rourke.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif[/img]
It was actually very similar in a lot of ways to The Wrestler, thematically. But Natalie Portman is a lot more fun to look at for 2 hours than Mickey Rourke.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
My taint is more fun to look at that Micky Rourke.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif[/img]