DeRosa Traded to Indians

[Ace]

<!--quoteo(post=8379:date=Jan 2 2009, 04:43 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Jan 2 2009, 04:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=8377:date=Jan 2 2009, 03:40 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Jan 2 2009, 03:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=8376:date=Jan 2 2009, 04:39 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jan 2 2009, 04:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=8372:date=Jan 2 2009, 03:37 PM:name=Mikey)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Mikey @ Jan 2 2009, 03:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Do you think that Derosa would resign with the Cubs for 2010?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I wouldn't want him back for 2010 -- not for the money he will likely get. But he was making $5.5M this year -- an absolute bargain for DeRosa. There was no reason to trade him unless we got something of value in return. And it appears that we didn't.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

<b>One </b>of the guys we got in the trade, Stevens, <b>looks </b>like he could be a <b>great </b>setup guy. I'm not saying it's a worthwhile haul unless <b>the other two are good prospects</b>, but just sayin'.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
*Could be* great setup guy? Sweet.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I can emphasize stuff, too, butt nugget.