11-27-2010, 01:29 AM
<!--quoteo(post=120714:date=Nov 26 2010, 07:46 PM:name=1060Ivy)-->QUOTE (1060Ivy @ Nov 26 2010, 07:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=120712:date=Nov 26 2010, 06:21 PM:name=rok)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rok @ Nov 26 2010, 06:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=120707:date=Nov 26 2010, 04:16 PM:name=1060Ivy)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (1060Ivy @ Nov 26 2010, 04:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Garland to Dodgers for 1 year $5 MM<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That's a good deal for them as he's a good fit for that ballpark.
That said, I'm glad we didn't sign him.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
200 innings with an era of 4 for $5 MM is a bargain
Lilly and Garland gives the Dodgers solid 3,4 starters
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
An ERA of 4 is probably his ceiling at Wrigley. It's a good deal for the Dodgers, but they can have him. We have enough #3/4 starters.
That's a good deal for them as he's a good fit for that ballpark.
That said, I'm glad we didn't sign him.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
200 innings with an era of 4 for $5 MM is a bargain
Lilly and Garland gives the Dodgers solid 3,4 starters
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
An ERA of 4 is probably his ceiling at Wrigley. It's a good deal for the Dodgers, but they can have him. We have enough #3/4 starters.