Milton Bradley and Cubs agree to deal?

[Ace]

<!--quoteo(post=8361:date=Jan 2 2009, 04:27 PM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ Jan 2 2009, 04:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=8356:date=Jan 2 2009, 03:25 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Jan 2 2009, 03:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=8351:date=Jan 2 2009, 04:20 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Jan 2 2009, 04:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <!--quotec-->Look at that list more carefully, though. It's quite deceptive - it lists all the injuries twice, so the list looks twice as long.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Or 4 times:

Apr 26, 2003: Strained right hamstring, 15-day DL (retroactive to April 23).
Apr 23, 2003: Strained right hamstring, day-to-day.
Apr 19, 2003: Missed 1 game (hamstring).
Apr 18, 2003: Hamstring, day-to-day.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/ruby.gif[/img]
Check again. It's virtually the entire list.

But Clapp is right, it's still very alarming.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
What am I wrong about? I was agreeing with you and even pointing out that in some instances they listed the same injury 4 consecutive times.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I thought you were saying they only did it 4 times...

*tail goes between legs* [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blush.gif[/img]