10-06-2010, 02:54 PM
<!--quoteo(post=116423:date=Oct 6 2010, 01:53 PM:name=funkster)-->QUOTE (funkster @ Oct 6 2010, 01:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=116397:date=Oct 6 2010, 12:55 PM:name=BT)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BT @ Oct 6 2010, 12:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=116394:date=Oct 6 2010, 12:51 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Oct 6 2010, 12:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->The outcome (in either direction) doesn't justify the decision.
If Lou pinch hit Marshall for Ramirez in a game-on-the-line RBI situation and Marshall hit a grand slam, that doesn't make it the right decision.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No, it wouldn't. But it would also be odd if you were still upset about it 5 months later.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
This thread has been exhausting. 52 pages and counting...
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Any minds getting changed yet?
If Lou pinch hit Marshall for Ramirez in a game-on-the-line RBI situation and Marshall hit a grand slam, that doesn't make it the right decision.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No, it wouldn't. But it would also be odd if you were still upset about it 5 months later.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
This thread has been exhausting. 52 pages and counting...
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Any minds getting changed yet?