Zambrano

[Scarey]

<!--quoteo(post=112941:date=Aug 31 2010, 09:44 AM:name=veryzer)-->QUOTE (veryzer @ Aug 31 2010, 09:44 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=112940:date=Aug 31 2010, 09:39 AM:name=BT)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BT @ Aug 31 2010, 09:39 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=112927:date=Aug 31 2010, 08:01 AM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ Aug 31 2010, 08:01 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=112924:date=Aug 31 2010, 07:32 AM:name=Coldneck)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Coldneck @ Aug 31 2010, 07:32 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I love me some Z. It may not be pretty, but it's the results that count.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

That's exactly right. Maybe next year, <b>with a good manager and possibly a good GM, we'll see the old Z</b>. Or at the very least, maybe he'll be given more than 4 games to pitch out of whatever problems he may have.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

yeah, but now Colvin isn't playing well. And since we've determined that player performance is clearly based on who the manager is, does that mean we have to bring Lou back so Colvin will be better? But then what happens to Zambrano?

It's all so complicated.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Is that really what you took out of that? That Zambrano sucked because Lou was the manager? Really?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Beats kinda has a point. Maybe you didn't intend it that way, but that's how it reads.