12-31-2008, 06:09 PM
<!--quoteo(post=8031:date=Dec 31 2008, 05:04 PM:name=rok)-->QUOTE (rok @ Dec 31 2008, 05:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=8030:date=Dec 31 2008, 04:01 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ Dec 31 2008, 04:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->If the report that we can't do the Peavy deal until the ownership is settled is true, we probably won't know for at least a month, unless the info's leaked that they have an agreement in place.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I wonder about those reports. I mean, we signed Dempster long-term, Miles to a 2 year deal and probably will need to go 3 years on Bradley. Why would we need special approval on Peavy and not the others?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Good point... I don't know. Just going by what they're saying. It seems like we'd be have the financial ability to make it happen without much of a problem now.
I wonder about those reports. I mean, we signed Dempster long-term, Miles to a 2 year deal and probably will need to go 3 years on Bradley. Why would we need special approval on Peavy and not the others?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Good point... I don't know. Just going by what they're saying. It seems like we'd be have the financial ability to make it happen without much of a problem now.
@TheBlogfines