07-27-2010, 08:57 AM
TBS became a different channel than WGN is. With the exception of the Braves, there had been nothing Atlanta-specific about TBS for at least a decade before they stopped showing Braves games. That's not the case with WGN. Also, WGN America has very little going for it that would make them want to not pay what the Cubs want.
It's got little to do with whether or not it makes sense financially for the Cubs. That question is answered based on how much WGN bids for the Cubs (though, I had read that it was expected that a long-term deal to keep the Cubs on WGN would be a part of the sale of the team, but obviously we have no clue whether or not that happened). If WGN bids enough, then it makes sense for the Cubs. Therefore the question really is whether or not it makes financial sense for WGN to pay to keep the Cubs, not the other way around (assuming that a deal wasn't a part of the sale).
It's got little to do with whether or not it makes sense financially for the Cubs. That question is answered based on how much WGN bids for the Cubs (though, I had read that it was expected that a long-term deal to keep the Cubs on WGN would be a part of the sale of the team, but obviously we have no clue whether or not that happened). If WGN bids enough, then it makes sense for the Cubs. Therefore the question really is whether or not it makes financial sense for WGN to pay to keep the Cubs, not the other way around (assuming that a deal wasn't a part of the sale).
This is not some silly theory that's unsupported and deserves being mocked by photos of Xena. ![[Image: ITgoyeg.png]](http://i.imgur.com/ITgoyeg.png)