12-31-2008, 02:27 PM
<!--quoteo(post=7883:date=Dec 31 2008, 12:24 PM:name=rok)-->QUOTE (rok @ Dec 31 2008, 12:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=7878:date=Dec 31 2008, 12:22 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Dec 31 2008, 12:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=7873:date=Dec 31 2008, 12:21 PM:name=Andy)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Andy @ Dec 31 2008, 12:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->This almost HAS to be a precursor to getting Peavy. Doesn't it?? I can't imagine any other reason to get rid of DeRosa<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'd say it's either for Peavy or to use to trade for a RFer. I'd lean Peavy though with Bradley a supposed done deal.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If we don't land both Bradley and Peavy now, or at least if that isn't Hendry's intention, then these deals make very little baseball sense.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If it's Hendry's intention and he doesn't already have the deals in place, then he's a moron. I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt for the moment.
Peavy
Zambrano
Dempster
Lilly
Harden
That might be the most ridonkulous rotation I have ever seen. It's almost overkill.
I'd say it's either for Peavy or to use to trade for a RFer. I'd lean Peavy though with Bradley a supposed done deal.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If we don't land both Bradley and Peavy now, or at least if that isn't Hendry's intention, then these deals make very little baseball sense.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If it's Hendry's intention and he doesn't already have the deals in place, then he's a moron. I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt for the moment.
Peavy
Zambrano
Dempster
Lilly
Harden
That might be the most ridonkulous rotation I have ever seen. It's almost overkill.