12-30-2008, 05:26 PM
<!--quoteo(post=7679:date=Dec 30 2008, 02:33 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Dec 30 2008, 02:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Stephenson over Billy Williams?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Since most of you guys are stats guys:
Stephenson's line: ba/obp/slg/ops
.336/.407/.473/.880
Williams:
.290/.361/.492/.853
Stephenson played 14 season, Williams 18. Since we've all decided that RBI aren't a good indicator of individual ability, I'm wondering why Stephenson shouldn't be #1?
Since most of you guys are stats guys:
Stephenson's line: ba/obp/slg/ops
.336/.407/.473/.880
Williams:
.290/.361/.492/.853
Stephenson played 14 season, Williams 18. Since we've all decided that RBI aren't a good indicator of individual ability, I'm wondering why Stephenson shouldn't be #1?
I got nothin'.
Andy
Andy