06-27-2010, 11:26 AM
<!--quoteo(post=103232:date=Jun 27 2010, 11:25 AM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Jun 27 2010, 11:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=103231:date=Jun 27 2010, 11:24 AM:name=Kid)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid @ Jun 27 2010, 11:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=103229:date=Jun 27 2010, 11:03 AM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Jun 27 2010, 11:03 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Methinks Z will waive a no-trade clause. Could that be the point of this?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That's what I was thinking.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
But what team would want him, even at an extremely reduced price? The Sox?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
At a reduced price, somebody would definitely take him. Alternatively, he could be traded for another bad contract ala Silva.
That's what I was thinking.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
But what team would want him, even at an extremely reduced price? The Sox?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
At a reduced price, somebody would definitely take him. Alternatively, he could be traded for another bad contract ala Silva.
This is not some silly theory that's unsupported and deserves being mocked by photos of Xena.