Hendry's Failures...

[vitaminB]

<!--quoteo(post=101734:date=Jun 16 2010, 03:53 PM:name=BT)-->QUOTE (BT @ Jun 16 2010, 03:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=101724:date=Jun 16 2010, 02:41 PM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ Jun 16 2010, 02:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=101646:date=Jun 16 2010, 08:44 AM:name=BT)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BT @ Jun 16 2010, 08:44 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=101509:date=Jun 15 2010, 02:12 PM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ Jun 15 2010, 02:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I said it once and I'll say it again, I think Hendry (and Lou) should not only be retained, but they should be extended. Seriously. How can anyone argue with the results? I'll even take it a step further and say that I wish the Tribune would have stayed on as owners. Continuity trumps winning any day.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->


Tom, make an argument, or don't. This shit is getting beyond tiresome.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Make an argument? I'm on your side. Hendry is a good GM, Lou is a good manager, and Russell Brand is a great actor. You've convinced me on all accounts. You're very persuasive.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


Thanks Tom. Can you clear something up for me though? Which formula are you currently using?

Douchebaggery=endless comedy

or

Douchebaggery= cleverness?


Or am I to assume that since you never actually make an argument, that you think repetitively marginalizing my opinion is just what the site needs?

Either way, it's pure genius.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

It's called humor, fag. And it's more fun to read than the pages and pages of stat arguing drivel you tend to add.