06-16-2010, 01:16 PM
<!--quoteo(post=101698:date=Jun 16 2010, 12:06 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 16 2010, 12:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=101697:date=Jun 16 2010, 12:02 PM:name=1060Ivy)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (1060Ivy @ Jun 16 2010, 12:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=101677:date=Jun 16 2010, 10:28 AM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 16 2010, 10:28 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=101675:date=Jun 16 2010, 10:21 AM:name=BT)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BT @ Jun 16 2010, 10:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=101659:date=Jun 16 2010, 09:30 AM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 16 2010, 09:30 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=101645:date=Jun 16 2010, 08:40 AM:name=BT)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BT @ Jun 16 2010, 08:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->You think his ERA makes him an average pitcher? Fine. WAR says in 2008 Marquis was more valuable than Marmol, even though Marmol's ERA was much better. You don't have to accept that, I can't make you accept that, but the fact is virtually every sabremetrician on the planet accepts that.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Interesting. Do you think any GM (sabre-minded or not) would trade 2008 Marmol for 2008 Marquis, straight up? Remove salary from the equation.
I'm thinking not, but I suppose I could be wrong.
Sort of makes me question the value of WAR as a metric...
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
They might. You'd have to ask them. Is 87 innings of really good pitching more valuable to a team over the course of a season than 166 innings of decent pitching ? I don't think the answer is as clear cut as you do.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'll start making some calls.
How about this. Would <b>you</b> trade 2008 Marmol for 2008 Marquis, straight up? Remove salary and age from the equation.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If you were building a team from scratch and given the choice between a lockdown set up man or an OK rubber armed pitcher, which would you choose?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'd take Marmol.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Everyone would take Marmol. It's not even a question. But, that's not the point of WAR. Me stating that's not the point of WAR is not defending Hendry signing Marquis either.
Interesting. Do you think any GM (sabre-minded or not) would trade 2008 Marmol for 2008 Marquis, straight up? Remove salary from the equation.
I'm thinking not, but I suppose I could be wrong.
Sort of makes me question the value of WAR as a metric...
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
They might. You'd have to ask them. Is 87 innings of really good pitching more valuable to a team over the course of a season than 166 innings of decent pitching ? I don't think the answer is as clear cut as you do.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'll start making some calls.
How about this. Would <b>you</b> trade 2008 Marmol for 2008 Marquis, straight up? Remove salary and age from the equation.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If you were building a team from scratch and given the choice between a lockdown set up man or an OK rubber armed pitcher, which would you choose?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'd take Marmol.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Everyone would take Marmol. It's not even a question. But, that's not the point of WAR. Me stating that's not the point of WAR is not defending Hendry signing Marquis either.