Cubs @ Astros 4/8/09

[Clapp]

<!--quoteo(post=28884:date=Apr 8 2009, 08:23 PM:name=CCwinwssoon)-->QUOTE (CCwinwssoon @ Apr 8 2009, 08:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=28872:date=Apr 8 2009, 09:19 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ Apr 8 2009, 09:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=28861:date=Apr 8 2009, 08:14 PM:name=CCwinwssoon)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CCwinwssoon @ Apr 8 2009, 08:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=28854:date=Apr 8 2009, 09:13 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ Apr 8 2009, 09:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Why the heck would you use Hoffpauir now?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Because Lou didn't want to waste Gathright or maybe because we traded Jason Marquis.<b> I totally agree.</b> If that would have went out, there would have been some major dick sucking and asking for lee's head on a platter.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If it would have went out, it would've extended our 5 run lead to 6 in the 6th inning. He's our big bat off the bench and he should be saved for a situation where we're looking for some power late in the game. I'd rather have used Miles or Reed there.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Yeah Clapp. I totally agreed. Lou will do some weird things every now and then.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Oh, my bad. I suck.

[ruby23]

Bad News Astros.

[CCwinwssoon]

Nah. I worded that whole paragraph weird. I guess 19 beers screws with my grammar.

[Runnys]

KB's right...Soriano shouldn't hit leadoff [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif[/img]

[Runnys]

I would really like to see a bunt here.

[Runnys]

I hope he moves this runner over. Otherwise there was no good reason for him to not be bunting this AB. That is an important run at 2nd right now.

[Runnys]

That girl looks dirty...and not in a good way.

[ruby23]

<!--quoteo(post=28890:date=Apr 8 2009, 09:28 PM:name=Runnys)-->QUOTE (Runnys @ Apr 8 2009, 09:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I hope he moves this runner over. Otherwise there was no good reason for him to not be bunting this AB. That is an important run at 2nd right now.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The advantages of bunting a runner from 2nd to 3rd are minimal at best.

[Runnys]

FUCK FUK!!!! You have got to move that runner over [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif[/img]

[Runnys]

<!--quoteo(post=28892:date=Apr 8 2009, 09:29 PM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ Apr 8 2009, 09:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=28890:date=Apr 8 2009, 09:28 PM:name=Runnys)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Runnys @ Apr 8 2009, 09:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I hope he moves this runner over. Otherwise there was no good reason for him to not be bunting this AB. That is an important run at 2nd right now.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The advantages of bunting a runner from 2nd to 3rd are minimal at best.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


With 1 out I would agree....with no outs, I completely disagree.

[sleepyhead]

<!--quoteo(post=28893:date=Apr 8 2009, 09:30 PM:name=Runnys)-->QUOTE (Runnys @ Apr 8 2009, 09:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->FUCK FUK!!!! You have got to move that runner over [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif[/img]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

He's had a phenomenal day and that was a good at bat, I have no problem with him not bunting.

[ruby23]

<!--quoteo(post=28894:date=Apr 8 2009, 09:30 PM:name=Runnys)-->QUOTE (Runnys @ Apr 8 2009, 09:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=28892:date=Apr 8 2009, 09:29 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Apr 8 2009, 09:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=28890:date=Apr 8 2009, 09:28 PM:name=Runnys)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Runnys @ Apr 8 2009, 09:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I hope he moves this runner over. Otherwise there was no good reason for him to not be bunting this AB. That is an important run at 2nd right now.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The advantages of bunting a runner from 2nd to 3rd are minimal at best.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


With 1 out I would agree....with no outs, I completely disagree.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No outs, Lee, Bradley, Rameriz coming up . . . minimal at best.

[Clapp]

<!--quoteo(post=28894:date=Apr 8 2009, 08:30 PM:name=Runnys)-->QUOTE (Runnys @ Apr 8 2009, 08:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=28892:date=Apr 8 2009, 09:29 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Apr 8 2009, 09:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=28890:date=Apr 8 2009, 09:28 PM:name=Runnys)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Runnys @ Apr 8 2009, 09:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I hope he moves this runner over. Otherwise there was no good reason for him to not be bunting this AB. That is an important run at 2nd right now.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The advantages of bunting a runner from 2nd to 3rd are minimal at best.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


With 1 out I would agree....with no outs, I completely disagree.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Do you really think the manager's going to ask a left-handed batter that's 3 for 3 to bunt up 4 runs with a runner on 2nd?

[sleepyhead]

Lee looks pretty bad today

[ruby23]

Time for the neatness Bradley.