Sons of Ivy
MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - Printable Version

+- Sons of Ivy (https://sonsofivy.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Chicago Cubs (https://sonsofivy.com/forum/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The Friendly Confines (https://sonsofivy.com/forum/forum-8.html)
+--- Thread: MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) (/thread-8401.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825


MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - Butcher - 05-19-2016

Quote:How about Harvey? He's been pretty bad this year.
I'm a petty bitch, but this makes me happy.


MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - Auz - 05-20-2016

https://twitter.com/thekapman/status/733473319786283009


Mark Prior would like to know too...


MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - Kid - 05-20-2016

Quote:A new strike zone could be on baseball's horizon and the old-fashioned intentional walk could be a thing of the past after both were agreed to by the competition committee at Major League Baseball's owners meetings this week, sources said.
 

The potentially dramatic changes could be in effect by next season.

 

The committee agreed on a motion to effectively raise the lower part of the strike zone to the top of the hitter's knees, sources said. The current rules stipulate that the zone begins at "the hollow beneath the kneecap," but the change is a reaction to a trend by umpires to call strikes on an increasing number of pitches below the knees.

 

The change in the intentional-walk rule would end the traditional practice of requiring the pitcher to lob four balls outside the strike zone. Instead, a team could signify it wants to issue an intentional walk, and the hitter would be immediately sent to first base, sources said.

 

The two changes can't go into effect unless they are approved by baseball's playing rules committee. Sources said the changes would also be presented to the MLB Players Association as part of negotiations for a new labor agreement. However, the playing rules committee isn't required to have the union sign off on the changes. So they could take effect next season whether or not the union agrees to them.

 

Both changes are designed to address concerns by commissioner Rob Manfred and others about pace of play and one of the commissioner's favorite terms, "pace of action." The end of the traditional intentional walk would eliminate dead time. However, the adjustment in the strike zone is designed to produce more balls in play, more baserunners and more action at a time when nearly 30 percent of hitters in the average game either walk or strike out, the highest rate of "non-action" in history.
 

Link




MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - jstraw - 05-20-2016

I'm sure eliminating the traditional intentional walk will be good for shortening the time of an average game by a good four or five seconds.




MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - 1984 - 05-20-2016

Low hanging fruit.  Trivial but, might as well.  



MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - jstraw - 05-20-2016

Might as well? Why? It's stupid.




MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - jstraw - 05-20-2016

How about eliminating rounding the bases on home runs? The batter and runners on base can just return to the dugout as soon as the umpire rules a homer.




MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - 1984 - 05-20-2016

Quote:Might as well? Why? It's stupid.
 

To show they're trying to do something? Anything else is going to be really difficult and will be met with a storm of protest.  As it turns out, even this one is being protested.



MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - jstraw - 05-20-2016

Because it's fucking stupid.




MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - rok - 05-20-2016

I don't have a problem with any of that.


MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - jstraw - 05-20-2016

Over the course of a season, there's an average of something around .2 IBB per game. POINT TWO...one for every five games. So we're really talking about something like six second per game (if an IBB takes all of 30 seconds).



MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - rok - 05-20-2016

Eliminating throwing IBB's is not really about reducing reducing actual length of games but more about speeding the pace of games up. IBB's slow the game down, and going through the motions is incredibly pointless.


MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - jstraw - 05-20-2016

Quote:Eliminating throwing IBB's is not really about reducing reducing actual length of games but more about speeding the pace of games up. IBB's slow the game down, and going through the motions is incredibly pointless.
 

I don't know what that means. In 1/5 of all MLB games it will speed up the pace of a half-inning by 30 seconds. Pitchers routinely take that long between individual pitches.

 

Manfred is concerned that the game times are rising again...so he's going to fuck with something that will have no effect on that. NO EFFECT. Nothing should ever...ever...ever be changed for no effect. Once in a blue moon, an IBB goes wrong and it's interesting as hell. Don't throw that away for *nothing*.

 

What is the purpose of a home run trot? It's equally a formality. Eliminating them would be very stupid too, but it would represent many more seconds of saved time.



MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - Kid - 05-20-2016

But Manfred has also talked about things that don't really affect the speed of the game, but the pace of it.  For example, replays.  He's said he doesn't think replay is really having an effect on how long games are taking, but he does have some concern that individual replays make the game seem slow.  I can understand how intentional walks - the formality of which is pretty pointless - would create the same issue, albeit to a lesser extent.




MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - rok - 05-20-2016

Pace doesn't always equal time saved. Watching an entire team stand around waiting for a pitcher to lob 4 pointless pitches over the plate is boring. It isn't necessary at all. Why do you care?