+- Sons of Ivy (https://sonsofivy.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Chicago Cubs (https://sonsofivy.com/forum/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The Friendly Confines (https://sonsofivy.com/forum/forum-8.html)
+--- Thread: MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) (/thread-8401.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - Kid - 01-16-2016
fWAR:
2010 - Heyward 4.7, Davis -0.7
2011 - Heyward 1.9, Davis -0.5
2012 - Heyward 6.5, Davis 2.1
2013 - Davis 7.0, Heyward 3.4
2014 - Heyward 5.2, Davis 0.8
2015 - Heyward 6.0, Davis 5.6
bWAR:
2010 - Heyward 6.4, Davis -0.5
2011 - Heyward 2.5, Davis -0.1
2012 - Heyward 5.8, Davis 1.6
2013 - Davis 6.5, Heyward 3.7
2014 - Heyward 6.2, Davis 1.8
2015 - Heyward 6.5, Davis 5.2
Davis turns 30 before the season. Heyward doesn't turn 27 until August. Both get $23M/season. Heyward gets 1 more season.
MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - Kid - 01-16-2016
Blah.
http://twitter.com/Buster_ESPN/status/688460749371510786
http://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/688460855252508674
MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - rok - 01-18-2016
https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/689276121855213568
MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - rok - 01-19-2016
Probably means no significant change for fans hoping for more streaming options, but no details yet.
https://twitter.com/ZachZagger/status/689463631956738049
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/instagraphs/mlb-plays-it-safe-settles-television-lawsuit/
MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - Kid - 01-19-2016
http://twitter.com/JeffPassan/status/689511190586859520
MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - Butcher - 01-19-2016
http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/14599589/re-imagining-baseball-robot-umpires-home-plate
MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - rok - 01-19-2016
Quote:http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/14599589/re-imagining-baseball-robot-umpires-home-plate
Money quote:
Quote:We have planes that make thousands of imperceptible course directions accurately and without human contact. We have machines that fabricate transistors for CPUs so small that they are only a few atoms wide. We have mapped out the human genome, the very building blocks of our existence. Yet somehow, in baseball, identifying where a white sphere crosses a white pentagon a couple of feet away is some monumental technological challenge? Poppycock.
MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - Andy - 01-20-2016
Quote:http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/14599589/re-imagining-baseball-robot-umpires-home-plate
I agree with both changes (computer strikezone and protection from dugout to dugout). Both seem simple enough to implement.
MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - Coldneck - 01-20-2016
Quote:
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Butcher" data-cid="269015" data-time="1453232697">
<div>
http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/14599589/re-imagining-baseball-robot-umpires-home-plate
I agree with both changes (computer strikezone and protection from dugout to dugout). Both seem simple enough to implement.
</div>
</blockquote>
Yep. Agree.
MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - 4FP - 01-20-2016
In. And In.
In on balls and strikes. Definitely in on extending the protection.
Oddly, I think three or four years ago I'd argue against either change.
I can't explain why the change in my thinking.
I grew up? I put down some teddy bears? What's next? Will I someday favor a NL DH?
Not understanding my process (or knowing what other silly opinions I'm clinging to) is a bit unnerving.
MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - chshdsck - 01-20-2016
I don't see pitchers getting onboard with this. Especially how umps "interpret" an outside strike. More times than not the pitcher gets the benefit of the doubt. Arrieta in the Wild Card game comes to mind. He pitched lights out, but he was getting great calls as well.
Also, pitchers will no longer benefit from a good framing catcher, which goes along with what I mentioned above.
I think we'll see a bump in offensive numbers if this would ever go into affect.
MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - Butcher - 01-20-2016
I'd be curious to see whether pitchers get more calls in their favor or more calls that should be strikes that are called balls. I'd guess it evens out, but veteran pitchers get the benefit of the doubt more often. Just like veteran batters often get the benefit of the doubt. If we're able to call them 100% accurately, it should be a no-brainer.
MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - jstraw - 01-20-2016
I'd bet WAY more pitched off the plate get called strikes than pitches over the plate get called balls.
MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - 4FP - 01-20-2016
IIRC pitchfx is used today after the game. The ump gets a report to go over that shows where he made calls that the system disagrees with. (And I bet Straw is right about the making most errors in the pitcher's favor. The batter seems to get more veteran-of-the-doubt with check swings to me, Butch) The idea is to school up each umpire, and over a given time period the league monitors that improvement.
My memory of it is hazy because I read about this in my pre-Cub days. (I think they beta tested pitchfx at Fenway (and Toronto?) in 2005 or 06, so there was a lot of scuttlebutt/fear about how it would be used. )
They'll need to try out using pitchfx during the game, like in the minors for a while, before they figure out exactly how to bring it online. Here is something that Sportvision tried last year.
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-automated-strike-zone-20150810-story.html
MLB News & Notes (other than Cubs or Sox) - 4FP - 01-20-2016
Here is a good article on the effect of pitchfx on umps, pitchers, hitters and games. So far.
http://www.hardballtimes.com/the-strike-zone-during-the-pitchfx-era/
"The strike zone has been changing since the possibility arose of grading umpires with newly installed pitch-tracking technology. Presumably, MLB has backed these changes, as it has the tools to direct umpires to call the strike zone differently."