+- Sons of Ivy (https://sonsofivy.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Chicago Cubs (https://sonsofivy.com/forum/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The Friendly Confines (https://sonsofivy.com/forum/forum-8.html)
+--- Thread: Joey G to Iowa? (/thread-7171.html)
Joey G to Iowa? - sleepyhead - 05-09-2009
<!--quoteo(post=36735:date=May 9 2009, 06:52 AM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ May 9 2009, 06:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->The Cubs have the third highest payroll in baseball. I agree that they have money constraints, I just think it's funny.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I haven't really lamented the loss of DeRosa until Ramirez went down last night. Cleveland is pretty bad though, perhaps they'd like to trade back?
Joey G to Iowa? - kbwsb - 05-09-2009
<!--quoteo(post=36739:date=May 9 2009, 08:49 AM:name=sleepyhead)-->QUOTE (sleepyhead @ May 9 2009, 08:49 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=36735:date=May 9 2009, 06:52 AM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ May 9 2009, 06:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->The Cubs have the third highest payroll in baseball. I agree that they have money constraints, I just think it's funny.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I haven't really lamented the loss of DeRosa until Ramirez went down last night. Cleveland is pretty bad though, perhaps they'd like to trade back?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It's astounding how no amount of evidence will convince some people.
The Chicago papers should have just printed this headline:
<!--coloro:#0000FF--><!--/coloro-->Hendry Finally Admits Colossal Blunder...Trades For Inferior DeRosa Clone Freel<!--colorc-->
<!--/colorc-->
Joey G to Iowa? - ruby23 - 05-09-2009
<!--quoteo(post=36742:date=May 9 2009, 11:42 AM:name=KBwsb)-->QUOTE (KBwsb @ May 9 2009, 11:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=36739:date=May 9 2009, 08:49 AM:name=sleepyhead)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (sleepyhead @ May 9 2009, 08:49 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=36735:date=May 9 2009, 06:52 AM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ May 9 2009, 06:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->The Cubs have the third highest payroll in baseball. I agree that they have money constraints, I just think it's funny.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I haven't really lamented the loss of DeRosa until Ramirez went down last night. Cleveland is pretty bad though, perhaps they'd like to trade back?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It's astounding how no amount of evidence will convince some people.
The Chicago papers should have just printed this headline:
<!--coloro:#0000FF--><!--/coloro-->Hendry Finally Admits Colossal Blunder...Trades For Inferior DeRosa Clone Freel<!--colorc-->
<!--/colorc-->
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No, it's amazing that some people are incapable of doing simple math. The fact that the trade had to be league approved because of the amount of $$$ sent to the Cubs by the O's should show that the Cubs aren't working with an unlimited budget.
Also, why would you admit to a blunder when it wasn't a blunder? Money aside, there's 2 other reasons DeRosa was traded: to get Fontenot more PT and to get more left handed.
Joey G to Iowa? - ruby23 - 05-09-2009
FWIW, Bruce Miles on NSBB has said almost the exact same thing I've been saying all along. The DeRosa trade and all of the moves made in the off season were done as money saving moves to help with backloaded contracts and the signing of Bradley, first and foremost.
Joey G to Iowa? - rok - 05-09-2009
<!--quoteo(post=36744:date=May 9 2009, 12:56 PM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ May 9 2009, 12:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->FWIW, Bruce Miles on NSBB has said almost the exact same thing I've been saying all along. The DeRosa trade and all of the moves made in the off season were done as money saving moves to help with backloaded contracts and the signing of Bradley, first and foremost.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I know this is gonna sound like I'm straddling the fence, but I agree with your logic but at the same time I also think KB and Butch make valid points. I think trading DeRo on the same day as we signed Miles just left a bad taste in our mouths, and it's just hard for some of us to get over it.
Joey G to Iowa? - Butcher - 05-09-2009
<!--quoteo(post=36744:date=May 9 2009, 12:56 PM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ May 9 2009, 12:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->FWIW, Bruce Miles on NSBB has said almost the exact same thing I've been saying all along. The DeRosa trade and all of the moves made in the off season were done as money saving moves to help with backloaded contracts and the signing of Bradley, first and foremost.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yup. That 2 million we saved (and have since pissed away) is going to really help offset Soriano's $136 million contract. Now that I've done the simple math, I totally see what you mean.
Joey G to Iowa? - kbwsb - 05-09-2009
<!--quoteo(post=36745:date=May 9 2009, 01:01 PM:name=rok)-->QUOTE (rok @ May 9 2009, 01:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=36744:date=May 9 2009, 12:56 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ May 9 2009, 12:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->FWIW, Bruce Miles on NSBB has said almost the exact same thing I've been saying all along. The DeRosa trade and all of the moves made in the off season were done as money saving moves to help with backloaded contracts and the signing of Bradley, first and foremost.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I know this is gonna sound like I'm straddling the fence, but I agree with your logic but at the same time I also think KB and Butch make valid points. I think trading DeRo on the same day as we signed Miles just left a bad taste in our mouths, and it's just hard for some of us to get over it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Rube, I get that we had to play around with the money. But with a $143M base, there's room to absorb an extra 1 or 2 mil, as in DeRo's case.
The thing that pisses me off are the people who are pretending to act astounded that Bradley and Aram <i>are actually getting hurt and missing games</i>! That, to me, was a clear <b>given</b>, long before the season began.
We have one of the oldest teams in the league. Steroids are being tested for and greenies and amphetamines are now illegal. Thus, old guys are gonna miss a lot of games. Fact.
Having a supersub like DeRosa would have been immensely valuable. Fact.
And puh-leeeeeze stop with the total bullshit about "but he was our 2nd baseman."
No. He was a utility guy his entire time with the Cubs. The fact that he was the best utility guy in the majors was why we won 97 games.
I'm happy we are trying to rectify the DeRo mistake by getting Freel, and I hope he contributes.
Joey G to Iowa? - bz - 05-09-2009
I wish we had DeRosa still. Butcher and KB are right.
Ruby, we get the money thing. We get it. But that doesn't mean we like it or accept it. I especially don't since we pissed away all that money we saved.
Joey G to Iowa? - Giff - 05-09-2009
<!--quoteo(post=36750:date=May 9 2009, 01:12 PM:name=KBwsb)-->QUOTE (KBwsb @ May 9 2009, 01:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->The thing that pisses me off are the people who are pretending to act astounded that Bradley and Aram <i>are actually getting hurt and missing games</i>! That, to me, was a clear <b>given</b>, long before the season began.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I dare you to name one person here who is "astounded" Bradley and Ramirez have gotten hurt.
<!--quoteo-->QUOTE <!--quotec-->And puh-leeeeeze stop with the total bullshit about "but he was our 2nd baseman."
No. He was a utility guy his entire time with the Cubs. The fact that he was the best utility guy in the majors was why we won 97 games.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Fine, let's break this down a little differently. Mark DeRosa started 80 games at 2B (out of 143 total he started for the season), Fontenot started 49, Cedeno 31, and Eric Patterson started 1. The Cubs wanted Mike Fontenot to be the starting second baseman for the 2009 season. Let's say, for the sake of days off and not starting against most lefties, that means he starts 135 games. So take his 49, give him Cedeno's 31 and Patterson's 1, which gets him to 81 starts. So that means he takes 54 starts from DeRosa, leaving him with 89 starts.
DeRosa also started 21 games in LF. Every single one (I went through and checked) of those 21 starts came while Soriano was on the DL. Since, before he was a Cub, Soriano had never been to the DL, there's no reason to assume he'd be headed to the DL. and Since DeRosa never started in LF while Soriano was on the active roster, it's pretty clear someone else would giving him days off. So let's just say Soriano stays healthy for the season. There goes most (if not all) of those 21 starts in LF (let's say we give him 5 starts out there). He also started 32 games in RF. With Fukudome and Bradley on the roster, it would be incredibly difficult to keep that number that high, so let's say 25 starts in RF for him. This leaves him with 66 starts.
All of the sudden, Lou and Hendry are telling a guy coming of a terrific three-year stretch, in the big contract year of his career, that he's going to lose over half his starts unless numerous guys get hurt? This is unreasonable and a poor use of resources, considering you can trade him to get pieces instead of just wasting him on the bench.
Joey G to Iowa? - bz - 05-09-2009
<!--quoteo(post=36764:date=May 9 2009, 02:39 PM:name=Giff)-->QUOTE (Giff @ May 9 2009, 02:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=36750:date=May 9 2009, 01:12 PM:name=KBwsb)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (KBwsb @ May 9 2009, 01:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->The thing that pisses me off are the people who are pretending to act astounded that Bradley and Aram <i>are actually getting hurt and missing games</i>! That, to me, was a clear <b>given</b>, long before the season began.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I dare you to name one person here who is "astounded" Bradley and Ramirez have gotten hurt.
<!--quoteo-->QUOTE <!--quotec-->And puh-leeeeeze stop with the total bullshit about "but he was our 2nd baseman."
No. He was a utility guy his entire time with the Cubs. The fact that he was the best utility guy in the majors was why we won 97 games.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Fine, let's break this down a little differently. Mark DeRosa started 80 games at 2B (out of 143 total he started for the season), Fontenot started 49, Cedeno 31, and Eric Patterson started 1. The Cubs wanted Mike Fontenot to be the starting second baseman for the 2009 season. Let's say, for the sake of days off and not starting against most lefties, that means he starts 135 games. So take his 49, give him Cedeno's 31 and Patterson's 1, which gets him to 81 starts. So that means he takes 54 starts from DeRosa, leaving him with 89 starts.
DeRosa also started 21 games in LF. Every single one (I went through and checked) of those 21 starts came while Soriano was on the DL. Since, before he was a Cub, Soriano had never been to the DL, there's no reason to assume he'd be headed to the DL. and Since DeRosa never started in LF while Soriano was on the active roster, it's pretty clear someone else would giving him days off. So let's just say Soriano stays healthy for the season. There goes most (if not all) of those 21 starts in LF (let's say we give him 5 starts out there). He also started 32 games in RF. With Fukudome and Bradley on the roster, it would be incredibly difficult to keep that number that high, so let's say 25 starts in RF for him. This leaves him with 66 starts.
All of the sudden, Lou and Hendry are telling a guy coming of a terrific three-year stretch, in the big contract year of his career, that he's going to lose over half his starts unless numerous guys get hurt? This is unreasonable and a poor use of resources, considering you can trade him to get pieces instead of just wasting him on the bench.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Dude really, what planet are you from? Fuck getting pieces when we're trying to win a god damn World Series. I can give two shits about whatever crappy pitchers we got from DeRosa.
Bottom line, the team would have been better with DeRosa. And I don't believe that we couldn't afford him when we're wasting money on players we've cut.
Joey G to Iowa? - bz - 05-09-2009
And why are we so worried about coddling these players? I guarantee you if DeRosa were on the team still and happened to bitch about his role, all of you would be yelling for him to suck it up and quit being a bitch. And none of you would be going "Welp, I empathize with him because it's a contract year blah blah blah"
Joey G to Iowa? - Giff - 05-09-2009
<!--quoteo(post=36768:date=May 9 2009, 02:47 PM:name=bz)-->QUOTE (bz @ May 9 2009, 02:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->And why are we so worried about coddling these players? I guarantee you if DeRosa were on the team still and happened to bitch about his role, all of you would be yelling for him to suck it up and quit being a bitch. And none of you would be going "Welp, I empathize with him because it's a contract year blah blah blah"<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It's not about "coddling" anyone. But it's incredibly important to keep your players happy. And it's playing with fire to turn someone like DeRosa into a bench player after all that he's done the last three seasons. So when you have a situation like that, with an adequate replacement for the job he would've been doing this year (not what he did last season), and you're looking to save money wherever you can, you trade him.
Joey G to Iowa? - bz - 05-09-2009
BUT HE WOULDN'T BE ON THE BENCH!
Jesus, Butch outlined this for you clowns. Plus, he <i>loved</i> being a Cub...something incredibly important to remember as well. He would have played catcher if he was asked to.
Joey G to Iowa? - Giff - 05-09-2009
<!--quoteo(post=36772:date=May 9 2009, 03:14 PM:name=bz)-->QUOTE (bz @ May 9 2009, 03:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->BUT HE WOULDN'T BE ON THE BENCH!
Jesus, Butch outlined this for you clowns. Plus, he <i>loved</i> being a Cub...something incredibly important to remember as well. He would have played catcher if he was asked to.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
So a guy who starts 66 games wouldn't be a bench player? Then I guess we have a different definition of what a bench player is.
Joey G to Iowa? - BT - 05-09-2009
<!--quoteo-->QUOTE <!--quotec-->The thing that pisses me off are the people who are pretending to act astounded that Bradley and Aram are actually getting hurt and missing games! That, to me, was a clear given, long before the season began.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
EXACTLY. Anyone but the mentally retarded can obviously see the Ramirez injury coming from a mile away. I mean he missed THIRTEEN games last year!!!!! What a fragile pussy! Then there was that ONE year (out of nine full seasons) where Mr Injury-waiting-to-happen played LESS than 130 games (Glass Joe only made it through 123 in 2005). I mean, he just turned THIRTY ONE! Most guy's careers are over by then, and they are sitting back in their rockers talking about the good old days. The obvious solution to this completely predicable injury would be to have paid 5.5 million dollars to a sprightly youngster, like the 34 year old DeRosa, and plant his ass on the bench to await Ramirez's inevitable breakdown.
Seriously, anyone who didn't see this freak injury resulting in Ramirez's (probable) longest stint on the DL in his career coming from a mile away, is living with blinders on.