Sons of Ivy
DeRosa Traded to Indians - Printable Version

+- Sons of Ivy (https://sonsofivy.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Chicago Cubs (https://sonsofivy.com/forum/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The Friendly Confines (https://sonsofivy.com/forum/forum-8.html)
+--- Thread: DeRosa Traded to Indians (/thread-8122.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29


DeRosa Traded to Indians - sleepyhead - 12-31-2008

Talking now. For pitching prospects Jeff Stevens, Chris Archer and John Gobbs.


DeRosa Traded to Indians - Butcher - 12-31-2008

Indiants?

This has to be part of a Peavy trade, right? Otherwise, it makes very little sense.


DeRosa Traded to Indians - rok - 12-31-2008

Peavy had better be next, or else.


DeRosa Traded to Indians - Andy - 12-31-2008

This almost HAS to be a precursor to getting Peavy. Doesn't it?? I can't imagine any other reason to get rid of DeRosa


DeRosa Traded to Indians - sleepyhead - 12-31-2008

<!--quoteo(post=7870:date=Dec 31 2008, 12:21 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Dec 31 2008, 12:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Indiants?

This has to be part of a Peavy trade, right? Otherwise, it makes very little sense.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Fixed. I was typing fast.

I agree, Peavy has to be next.


DeRosa Traded to Indians - Butcher - 12-31-2008

<!--quoteo(post=7873:date=Dec 31 2008, 12:21 PM:name=Andy)-->QUOTE (Andy @ Dec 31 2008, 12:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->This almost HAS to be a precursor to getting Peavy. Doesn't it?? I can't imagine any other reason to get rid of DeRosa<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Jinx.


DeRosa Traded to Indians - Andy - 12-31-2008

But I always thought DeRosa was supposed to be "part" of the Peavy trade. As in, we'd trade him to a 3rd team as part of the deal. Unless we intend to use these prospects as part of the Peavy deal??


DeRosa Traded to Indians - ruby23 - 12-31-2008

<!--quoteo(post=7873:date=Dec 31 2008, 12:21 PM:name=Andy)-->QUOTE (Andy @ Dec 31 2008, 12:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->This almost HAS to be a precursor to getting Peavy. Doesn't it?? I can't imagine any other reason to get rid of DeRosa<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'd say it's either for Peavy or to use to trade for a RFer. I'd lean Peavy though with Bradley a supposed done deal.


DeRosa Traded to Indians - Captain - 12-31-2008

Peavy is a pipedream.
This was another payroll cut.


DeRosa Traded to Indians - Butcher - 12-31-2008

<!--quoteo(post=7876:date=Dec 31 2008, 12:22 PM:name=Andy)-->QUOTE (Andy @ Dec 31 2008, 12:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->But I always thought DeRosa was supposed to be "part" of the Peavy trade. As in, we'd trade him to a 3rd team as part of the deal. Unless we intend to use these prospects as part of the Peavy deal??<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The Padres wanted pitching prospects in the Peavy deal. We didn't really have much in that department. Now we do.


DeRosa Traded to Indians - sleepyhead - 12-31-2008

<!--quoteo(post=7876:date=Dec 31 2008, 12:22 PM:name=Andy)-->QUOTE (Andy @ Dec 31 2008, 12:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->But I always thought DeRosa was supposed to be "part" of the Peavy trade. As in, we'd trade him to a 3rd team as part of the deal. Unless we intend to use these prospects as part of the Peavy deal??<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

That would be my guess. I'm pretty sure it was said that the Padres wanted more pitching prospects and the Cubs didn't have many. I think the fact that we got all pitching prospects for DeRo certainly falls in line with that.


DeRosa Traded to Indians - SandbergMVP1984 - 12-31-2008

We're totally getting Roberts now too. Where's BART?


DeRosa Traded to Indians - rok - 12-31-2008

<!--quoteo(post=7878:date=Dec 31 2008, 12:22 PM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ Dec 31 2008, 12:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=7873:date=Dec 31 2008, 12:21 PM:name=Andy)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Andy @ Dec 31 2008, 12:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->This almost HAS to be a precursor to getting Peavy. Doesn't it?? I can't imagine any other reason to get rid of DeRosa<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'd say it's either for Peavy or to use to trade for a RFer. I'd lean Peavy though with Bradley a supposed done deal.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If we don't land both Bradley and Peavy now, or at least if that isn't Hendry's intention, then these deals make very little baseball sense.


DeRosa Traded to Indians - Butcher - 12-31-2008

<!--quoteo(post=7882:date=Dec 31 2008, 12:24 PM:name=Sandberg)-->QUOTE (Sandberg @ Dec 31 2008, 12:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->We're totally getting Roberts now too. Where's BART?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Haven't seen him lately.

BUTCHER


DeRosa Traded to Indians - ruby23 - 12-31-2008

<!--quoteo(post=7884:date=Dec 31 2008, 12:25 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Dec 31 2008, 12:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=7882:date=Dec 31 2008, 12:24 PM:name=Sandberg)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Sandberg @ Dec 31 2008, 12:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->We're totally getting Roberts now too. Where's BART?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Haven't seen him lately.

BUTCHER
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Bull Butter.